↓ Skip to main content

Activating Mutations in the Gene Encoding the ATP-Sensitive Potassium-Channel Subunit Kir6.2 and Permanent Neonatal Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1019 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activating Mutations in the Gene Encoding the ATP-Sensitive Potassium-Channel Subunit Kir6.2 and Permanent Neonatal Diabetes
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2004
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa032922
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L Gloyn, Ewan R Pearson, Jennifer F Antcliff, Peter Proks, G Jan Bruining, Annabelle S Slingerland, Neville Howard, Shubha Srinivasan, José M C L Silva, Janne Molnes, Emma L Edghill, Timothy M Frayling, I Karen Temple, Deborah Mackay, Julian P H Shield, Zdenek Sumnik, Adrian van Rhijn, Jerry K H Wales, Penelope Clark, Shaun Gorman, Javier Aisenberg, Sian Ellard, Pål R Njølstad, Frances M Ashcroft, Andrew T Hattersley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 332 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Student > Master 41 12%
Other 25 7%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 54 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 69 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,123,423
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#10,221
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,248
of 63,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#23
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.