↓ Skip to main content

Primary care providers’ willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Primary care providers’ willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents
Published in
Familial Cancer, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10689-009-9243-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne C. O’Neill, Beth N. Peshkin, George Luta, Anisha Abraham, Leslie R. Walker, Kenneth P. Tercyak

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines discourage pediatric genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations due to a lack of timely medical benefit and psychosocial risk. Yet, some high risk families approach primary care providers (PCPs) about testing adolescents, and little is known about PCPs attitudes regarding these requests. We assessed recommendations for testing to a composite patient (a healthy 13-year-old female, mother is a BRCA mutation carrier) among 161 adolescent and family PCPs attending a national medical conference. Testing recommendations were measured with a multidimensional scale that assessed perspectives on informed consent, genetic counseling, and insurance coverage. PCPs expressed moderate willingness to recommend testing; surprisingly, 31% recommended adolescent testing "unconditionally." In multivariable regression modeling, recommendation was positively associated with higher clinical practice volume (P < .05) and greater frequency of ordering other pediatric genetic tests (P < .01). Despite a decade of clinical practice guideline advice to the contrary, experienced PCPs may still be inclined to recommend BRCA1/2 genetic testing to adolescents from high risk families. When paired with emerging data on the relative safety and efficacy of breast cancer genetic testing for high risk women and the advent of direct-to-consumer marketing of BRCA1/2 cancer genetic tests, professional societies may need to explore best practices to counsel high risk families and their PCPs about the potential risks and benefits of pediatric BRCA1/2 testing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Librarian 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2010.
All research outputs
#5,469,753
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#102
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,492
of 93,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.