↓ Skip to main content

Marine Bacterial Degradation of Brominated Methanes

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Marine Bacterial Degradation of Brominated Methanes
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, October 1997
DOI 10.1021/es970165g
Authors

Kelly D. Goodwin, Mary E. Lidstrom, Ronald S. Oremland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2005.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#9,522
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,434
of 29,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.