You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-Scale Analysis of Association Between LRP5 and LRP6 Variants and Osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.299.11.1277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joyce B. J. van Meurs, Thomas A. Trikalinos, Stuart H. Ralston, Susana Balcells, Maria Luisa Brandi, Kim Brixen, Douglas P. Kiel, Bente L. Langdahl, Paul Lips, Östen Ljunggren, Roman Lorenc, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, Claes Ohlsson, Ulrika Pettersson, David M. Reid, Francois Rousseau, Serena Scollen, Wim Van Hul, Lidia Agueda, Kristina Åkesson, Lidia I. Benevolenskaya, Serge L. Ferrari, Göran Hallmans, Albert Hofman, Lise Bjerre Husted, Marcin Kruk, Stephen Kaptoge, David Karasik, Magnus K. Karlsson, Mattias Lorentzon, Laura Masi, Fiona E. A. McGuigan, Dan Mellström, Leif Mosekilde, Xavier Nogues, Huibert A. P. Pols, Jonathan Reeve, Wilfried Renner, Fernando Rivadeneira, Natasja M. van Schoor, Kurt Weber, John P. A. Ioannidis, André G. Uitterlinden, for the GENOMOS Study |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Professor | 13 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,918,121
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#14,762
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,400
of 97,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#52
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.