↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Sediment Toxicity Test Methods at Three Great Lake Areas of Concern

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of Sediment Toxicity Test Methods at Three Great Lake Areas of Concern
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 1996
DOI 10.1016/s0380-1330(96)70975-9
Authors

G. Allen Burton, Christopher G. Ingersoll, LouAnn C. Burnett, Mary Henry, Mark L. Hinman, Stephen J. Klaine, Peter F. Landrum, Phillipe Ross, Marc Tuchman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Engineering 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2006.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#603
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,809
of 79,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.