You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Loci Associated With C-Reactive Protein Levels and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2009.954 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Elliott, John C. Chambers, Weihua Zhang, Robert Clarke, Jemma C. Hopewell, John F. Peden, Jeanette Erdmann, Peter Braund, James C. Engert, Derrick Bennett, Lachlan Coin, Deborah Ashby, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Ian J. Brown, Shahrul Mt-Isa, Mark I. McCarthy, Leena Peltonen, Nelson B. Freimer, Martin Farrall, Aimo Ruokonen, Anders Hamsten, Noha Lim, Philippe Froguel, Dawn M. Waterworth, Peter Vollenweider, Gerard Waeber, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Vincent Mooser, James Scott, Alistair S. Hall, Heribert Schunkert, Sonia S. Anand, Rory Collins, Nilesh J. Samani, Hugh Watkins, Jaspal S. Kooner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 24% |
| Researcher | 62 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,529,835
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#10,865
of 36,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,567
of 126,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#29
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.