| Title |
Neurological changes in cats following long-term diet of mercury contaminated tuna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, June 1974
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00687167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louis W. Chang, Seiya Yamaguchi, Alden W. Dudley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,738,834
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#385
of 2,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 3,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them