↓ Skip to main content

TECHNICAL CLARITY IN INTER‐AGENCY NEGOTIATIONS: LESSONS FROM FOUR HYDROPOWER PROJECTS1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TECHNICAL CLARITY IN INTER‐AGENCY NEGOTIATIONS: LESSONS FROM FOUR HYDROPOWER PROJECTS1
Published in
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, June 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03372.x
Authors

Nina Burkardt, Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor, Terry J. Waddle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,554,930
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#381
of 1,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,607
of 82,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#141
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.