↓ Skip to main content

Successful Immunotherapy of HCMV Disease Using Virus‐Specific T Cells Expanded from an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successful Immunotherapy of HCMV Disease Using Virus‐Specific T Cells Expanded from an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, November 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02872.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

G.R. Hill, S.‐K. Tey, L. Beagley, T. Crough, J.A. Morton, A.D. Clouston, P. Whiting, R. Khanna

Abstract

Opportunistic infection remains the principal cause of mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with active extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) represents an important cause of disease in this setting and the toxicity of protracted and recurrent antiviral treatment together with eventual drug resistance represents a significant limitation to therapy. Although the expansion and adoptive transfer of HCMV-specific T cells from the healthy original donor can be an effective strategy to control viral replication, this is not possible when donors are seronegative or are subsequently inaccessible. Here we demonstrate for the first time, the successful expansion of HCMV-specific T cells from a seropositive transplant recipient of a seronegative graft with active HCMV disease and the long-term reconstitution of protective antiviral immunity following their adoptive transfer back into the patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,475,309
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#683
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,288
of 177,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.