↓ Skip to main content

Ability of beach users to identify rip currents at Pensacola Beach, Florida

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Ability of beach users to identify rip currents at Pensacola Beach, Florida
Published in
Natural Hazards, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0673-3
Authors

Nicole Caldwell, Chris Houser, Klaus Meyer-Arendt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Lecturer 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 23%
Engineering 6 13%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,888,916
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,214
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,112
of 199,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.