↓ Skip to main content

Stimulated anoxic biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons using Fe(III) ligands

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stimulated anoxic biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons using Fe(III) ligands
Published in
Nature, July 1994
DOI 10.1038/370128a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek R. Lovley, Joan C. Woodward, Francis H. Chapelle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Researcher 20 19%
Professor 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 30%
Environmental Science 28 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 1995.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,514
of 91,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,289
of 21,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#120
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.