↓ Skip to main content

Self-care as a professional imperative: physician burnout, depression, and suicide

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
Title
Self-care as a professional imperative: physician burnout, depression, and suicide
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12630-016-0781-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Kuhn, Ellen M. Flanagan

Abstract

Burnout has been identified in approximately half of all practicing physicians, including anesthesiologists. In this narrative review, the relationship between burnout, depression, and suicide is explored, with particular attention to the anesthesiologist. Throughout this review, we highlight our professional imperative regarding this epidemic. The authors searched the existing English language literature via PubMed from 1986 until present using the search terms physician burnout, depression, and suicide, with particular attention to studies regarding anesthesiologists and strategies to address these problems. Burnout and depression have increased among physicians, while the rate of suicide has remained relatively the same. There are many factors associated with burnout and depression as well as many causes. Certain individual factors include sex, amount of social support, and mental health history. Systems factors that play a role in burnout and depression include work compression, demands of electronic health records, production pressure, and lack of control over one's professional life. Medical license applications include questions that reinforce the stigma of psychological stresses and discourage physicians from seeking appropriate care. The concept of physician well-being is multidimensional and includes factors related to each physician as an individual as well as to the working environment. Anesthesiologists must actively engage in self-care. Anesthesiology practices and healthcare organizations should evaluate the balance between demands they place on physicians and the resources provided to sustain an engaged, productive, and satisfied physician workforce. National efforts must be rallied to support physicians seeking help for physical and psychological health problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 119 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 27%
Psychology 48 14%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 133 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,784,959
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#215
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,618
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.