↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of undiscovered deposits in quantitative mineral resource assessments—examples from Venezuela and Puerto Rico

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Resources Research, June 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 136)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of undiscovered deposits in quantitative mineral resource assessments—examples from Venezuela and Puerto Rico
Published in
Natural Resources Research, June 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf02272805
Authors

Dennis P. Cox

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 58%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 58%
Engineering 3 25%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Natural Resources Research
#46
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,829
of 19,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Resources Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them