↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders at Different Cognitive Levels

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Brief Report: The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders at Different Cognitive Levels
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0704-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrienne Perry, Helen E. Flanagan, Jennifer Dunn Geier, Nancy L. Freeman

Abstract

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) data were examined in a large sample of young children with ASD (n = 290) of varying cognitive levels. IQ was higher than VABS composite score among high functioning children only; the opposite pattern was found in lower IQ subgroups. Profile analysis of VABS domains across cognitive levels demonstrated different profiles in different subgroups. A characteristic "autism profile" was found for most subgroups for Age Equivalents but not Standard Scores. In a small set of matched pairs (n = 28) of children with autism versus MR, significantly different profiles were found, with Socialization and Communication lower in autism, but no differences were found between matched pairs of children with autism and PDD-NOS (n = 48). Correlations between age, cognitive level, and adaptive level were also reported, and regression analyses indicated that autism severity accounts for a modest amount of unique variance in Socialization and Daily Living Skills.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 20%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 10%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 121 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 10%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,333,205
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,448
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,228
of 96,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.