↓ Skip to main content

Development of the 1990 Kalapana Flow Field, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Development of the 1990 Kalapana Flow Field, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00302000
Authors

Tari N. Mattox, Christina Heliker, Jim Kauahikaua, Ken Hon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 73%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,857
of 19,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them