Title |
Mount St. Helens a decade after the 1980 eruptions: magmatic models, chemical cycles, and a revised hazards assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, January 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00278003 |
Authors |
John S Pallister, Richard P Hoblitt, Dwight R Crandell, Donal R Mullineaux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 37 | 61% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,540
of 61,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.