↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2023
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0279201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lily C. Taylor, Katie Law, Alison Hutchinson, Rebecca A. Dennison, Juliet A. Usher-Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Philosophy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,945,879
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#161,121
of 200,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,439
of 358,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5,137
of 5,464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.