Title |
Genotype by Environment Interaction in Adolescents’ Cognitive Aptitude
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavior Genetics, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10519-006-9113-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Paige Harden, Eric Turkheimer, John C. Loehlin |
Abstract |
In a replication of Turkheimer, Haley, Waldron, D'Onofrio, Gottesman II (2003, Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14:623-628), we investigate genotype-environment (G x E) interaction in the cognitive aptitude of 839 twin pairs who completed the National Merit Scholastic Qualifying Test in 1962. Shared environmental influences were stronger for adolescents from poorer homes, while genetic influences were stronger for adolescents from more affluent homes. No significant differences were found between parental income and parental education interaction effects. Results suggest that environmental differences between middle- to upper-class families influence the expression of genetic potential for intelligence, as has previously been suggested by Bronfenbrenner and Ceci's (1994, Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model Psychological Review, 101:568-586) bioecological model. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 17% |
Italy | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 4% |
India | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 147 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
Researcher | 26 | 16% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Other | 40 | 24% |
Unknown | 15 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 76 | 46% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 18% |