↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of a gasless unilateral axillo-breast and axillary approach in robotic thyroidectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of a gasless unilateral axillo-breast and axillary approach in robotic thyroidectomy
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-2964-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Myeon Song, Yong Hee Cho, Yong Bae Ji, Jin Hyeok Jeong, Dong Sun Kim, Kyung Tae

Abstract

New approaches to robotic thyroidectomy help to prevent neck scarring and improve surgical ergonomics. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and advantages of a gasless unilateral axillary (GUA) approach and an axillo-breast (GUAB) approach in robotic thyroidectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,168,910
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,236
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,414
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#39
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.