↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for cumulative effects in a Dnmt3b hypomorph across multiple generations

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for cumulative effects in a Dnmt3b hypomorph across multiple generations
Published in
Mammalian Genome, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00335-013-9451-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A. Youngson, Trevor Epp, Amity R. Roberts, Lucia Daxinger, Alyson Ashe, Edward Huang, Krystal L. Lester, Sarah K. Harten, Graham F. Kay, Timothy Cox, Jacqueline M. Matthews, Suyinn Chong, Emma Whitelaw

Abstract

Observations of inherited phenotypes that cannot be explained solely through genetic inheritance are increasing. Evidence points to transmission of non-DNA molecules in the gamete as mediators of the phenotypes. However, in most cases it is unclear what the molecules are, with DNA methylation, chromatin proteins, and small RNAs being the most prominent candidates. From a screen to generate novel mouse mutants of genes involved in epigenetic reprogramming, we produced a DNA methyltransferase 3b allele that is missing exon 13. Mice that are homozygous for the mutant allele have smaller stature and reduced viability, with particularly high levels of female post-natal death. Reduced DNA methylation was also detected at telocentric repeats and the X-linked Hprt gene. However, none of the abnormal phenotypes or DNA methylation changes worsened with multiple generations of homozygous mutant inbreeding. This suggests that in our model the abnormalities are reset each generation and the processes of transgenerational epigenetic reprogramming are effective in preventing their inheritance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Australia 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 41%
Researcher 6 35%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,050,520
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#872
of 1,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,871
of 205,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.