↓ Skip to main content

Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: What the public expects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: What the public expects
Published in
Environmental Management, January 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02394019
Authors

Hanna J. Cortner, Philip D. Gardner, Jonathan G. Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 33%
Social Sciences 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Engineering 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,405
of 58,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.