| Title |
Adaptation or preadaptation: why are keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii) less vulnerable to invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) than are other Australian snakes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10682-010-9369-2 |
| Authors |
John Llewelyn, Ben L. Phillips, Greg P. Brown, Lin Schwarzkopf, Ross A. Alford, Richard Shine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2010.
All research outputs
#5,678,645
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#195
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,351
of 94,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.