↓ Skip to main content

The origins of cancer robustness and evolvability

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Biology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 670)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The origins of cancer robustness and evolvability
Published in
Integrative Biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1039/c0ib00046a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianhai Tian, Sarah Olson, James M. Whitacre, Angus Harding

Abstract

Unless diagnosed early, many adult cancers remain incurable diseases. This is despite an intense global research effort to develop effective anticancer therapies, calling into question the use of rational drug design strategies in targeting complex disease states such as cancer. A fundamental challenge facing researchers and clinicians is that cancers are inherently robust biological systems, able to survive, adapt and proliferate despite the perturbations resulting from anticancer drugs. It is essential that the mechanisms underlying tumor robustness be formally studied and characterized, as without a thorough understanding of the principles of tumor robustness, strategies to overcome therapy resistance are unlikely to be found. Degeneracy describes the ability of structurally distinct system components (e.g. proteins, pathways, cells, organisms) to be conditionally interchangeable in their contribution to system traits and it has been broadly implicated in the robustness and evolvability of complex biological systems. Here we focus on one of the most important mechanisms underpinning tumor robustness and degeneracy, the cellular heterogeneity that is the hallmark of most solid tumors. Based on a combination of computational, experimental and clinical studies we argue that stochastic noise is an underlying cause of tumor heterogeneity and particularly degeneracy. Drawing from a number of recent data sets, we propose an integrative model for the evolution of therapy resistance, and discuss recent computational studies that propose new therapeutic strategies aimed at defeating the adaptable cancer phenotype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 233 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 52 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,108,797
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Biology
#41
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,435
of 180,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Biology
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.