↓ Skip to main content

Correspondence between Vegetation and Soils in Wetlands and Nearby Uplands

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, June 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Correspondence between Vegetation and Soils in Wetlands and Nearby Uplands
Published in
Wetlands, June 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf03160767
Authors

Michael L. Scott, William L. Slauson, Charles A. Segelquist, Gregor T. Auble

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1995.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#227
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,166
of 14,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them