You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification and Comparison of Small RNAs from Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Plant Biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J Axtell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 939 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 893 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 240 | 26% |
| Researcher | 179 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 118 | 13% |
| Unknown | 137 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 515 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 193 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 9 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 3% |
| Unknown | 170 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,310,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Plant Biology
#323
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,667
of 299,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Plant Biology
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.