↓ Skip to main content

Volcanic hazards from Bezymianny- and Bandai-type eruptions

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, February 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Volcanic hazards from Bezymianny- and Bandai-type eruptions
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, February 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01046635
Authors

Lee Siebert, Harry Glicken, Tadahide Ui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
New Caledonia 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 52 65%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,546
of 44,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them