↓ Skip to main content

Quantum Arthur–Merlin games

Overview of attention for article published in computational complexity, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Quantum Arthur–Merlin games
Published in
computational complexity, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00037-005-0194-x
Authors

Chris Marriott, John Watrous

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 10%
Japan 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 33 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 44%
Physics and Astronomy 15 38%
Mathematics 4 10%
Linguistics 1 3%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,226,370
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from computational complexity
#17
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,008
of 59,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from computational complexity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them