↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics of faults and shear zones in deep mines

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics of faults and shear zones in deep mines
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, January 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00875721
Authors

Robert E. Wallace, Hal T. Morris

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 72%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 1995.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#188
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,249
of 43,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them