↓ Skip to main content

Ages of tuff beds at East African early hominid sites and sediments in the Gulf of Aden

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ages of tuff beds at East African early hominid sites and sediments in the Gulf of Aden
Published in
Nature, January 1985
DOI 10.1038/313306a0
Authors

A. M. Sarna-Wojcicki, C. E. Meyer, P. H. Roth, F. H. Brown

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Switzerland 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 50%
Social Sciences 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,514
of 91,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,332
of 38,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#78
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.