You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HEAVY METALS IN WHITE-TAILED DEER LIVING NEAR A ZINC SMELTER IN PENNSYLVANIA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 1985
|
| DOI | 10.7589/0090-3558-21.3.289 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Sileo, W. N. Beyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2008.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#263
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,160
of 9,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.