↓ Skip to main content

Magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function: a systematic review
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10549-008-0246-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela K. Levangie, Jacqueline Drouin

Abstract

Late effects of treatment for breast cancer on shoulder function have been documented by a number of investigators; however, many studies include only prevalence data. When comparisons are provided that assess differences between treatment groups, only P-values without magnitudes of effect are often reported. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify literature that could be used to examine the magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function with a particular focus on axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and on radiotherapy. A comprehensive search of online databases was performed for research papers published between 1980 and 2008 that provided comparison data between treatment groups, between the affected and unaffected side of individuals, or between pre-operative and subsequent assessments 12 months or more after diagnosis of breast cancer. Papers that met inclusion criteria were reviewed using a methodological checklist. Standardized effect sizes were computed for continuous data; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed for dichotomous data if not already available. Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. With a few exceptions, most analyses showed excess shoulder morbidity with breast cancer treatment, ALND, or radiotherapy. Although effect sizes varied, moderate to large effects predominated across the different outcomes. There is sufficient evidence of late effects of ALND or radiotherapy post-breast cancer to warrant careful attention to shoulder function across time in individuals who have had breast cancer. Implications for future shoulder dysfunction are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,245,580
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,573
of 4,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,927
of 168,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.