↓ Skip to main content

Compton suppression gamma-counting: The effect of count rate

Overview of attention for article published in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, June 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Compton suppression gamma-counting: The effect of count rate
Published in
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, June 1984
DOI 10.1016/0167-5087(84)90685-9
Authors

H.T. Millard

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 1987.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
#63
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,478
of 9,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.