↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection Controlled by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and EBV-Specific T Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Infection Controlled by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and EBV-Specific T Cells
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 2023
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciad131
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report sustained remission of chronic active EBV infection in a 27-year-old female patient treated with third-party EBV-specific T-cells followed by allogeneic HSCT. The viremia cleared after administration of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin for GvHD prophylaxis. Subsequent expansion of EBV-infected host T-cells was controlled by transfusion of donor-derived EBV-specific T-cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,507,828
of 26,874,130 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#9,455
of 17,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,689
of 435,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#122
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,874,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.