| Title |
Fe-Ti oxide geothermometry: thermodynamic formulation and the estimation of intensive variables in silicic magmas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, October 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00303452 |
| Authors |
Mark S. Ghiorso, O. Sack |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 175 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 33% |
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 134 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,609,390
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#32
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#616
of 17,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them