| Title |
Illustrating the Multiple Facets and Levels of Fidelity of Implementation to a Teacher Classroom Management Intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-013-0496-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy M. Reinke, Keith C. Herman, Melissa Stormont, Lori Newcomer, Kimberly David |
| Abstract |
Many school-based interventions to promote student mental health rely on teachers as implementers. Thus, understanding the interplay between the multiple domains of fidelity to the intervention and intervention support systems such as coaching and teacher implementation of new skills is an important aspect of implementation science. This study describes a systematic process for assessing multiple domains of fidelity. Data from a larger efficacy trial of the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management (IY TCM) program are utilized. Data on fidelity to the IY TCM workshop training sessions and onsite weekly coaching indicate that workshop leaders and the IY TCM coach implemented the training and coaching model with adequate adherence. Further, workshop leaders' ratings of engagement were associated with teacher implementation of specific praise, following training on this content. Lastly, the IY TCM coach differentiation of teacher exposure to coaching was evaluated and found to be associated with teacher implementation of classroom management practices and student disruptive behavior. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,646,376
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#229
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,146
of 205,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.