↓ Skip to main content

Sex hormones and skeletal muscle weakness

Overview of attention for article published in Biogerontology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Sex hormones and skeletal muscle weakness
Published in
Biogerontology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10522-013-9425-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarianna Sipilä, Marco Narici, Michael Kjaer, Eija Pöllänen, Ross A. Atkinson, Mette Hansen, Vuokko Kovanen

Abstract

Human ageing is accompanied with deterioration in endocrine functions the most notable and well characterized of which being the decrease in the production of sex hormones. Current research literature suggests that low sex hormone concentration may be among the key mechanism for sarcopenia and muscle weakness. Within the European large scale MYOAGE project, the role of sex hormones, estrogens and testosterone, in causing the aging-related loss of muscle mass and function was further investigated. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women is shown to diminish age-associated muscle loss, loss in fast muscle function (power), and accumulation of fat in skeletal muscle. Further HRT raises the protein synthesis rate in skeletal muscle after resistance training, and has an anabolic effect upon connective tissue in both skeletal muscle and tendon, which influences matrix structure and mechanical properties. HRT influences gene expression in e.g. cytoskeletal and cell-matrix proteins, has a stimulating effect upon IGF-I, and a role in IL-6 and adipokine regulation. Despite low circulating steroid-hormone level, postmenopausal women have a high local concentration of steroidogenic enzymes in skeletal muscle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 24%
Sports and Recreations 21 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,062,107
of 24,833,726 outputs
Outputs from Biogerontology
#225
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,583
of 196,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogerontology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.