↓ Skip to main content

The cost of maturing early in a solitary carnivore

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
The cost of maturing early in a solitary carnivore
Published in
Oecologia, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1713-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erlend B. Nilsen, Henrik Brøseth, John Odden, John D. C. Linnell

Abstract

Central to the theory of life history evolution is the existence of trade-offs between different traits, such as the trade-off between early maturity and an extended period of body growth. Based on analysis of the reproductive tracts of harvested Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) females in Norway, we find that females that mature early are generally heavier than those that postpone maturation. A higher proportion of 1.5-year-old females showed signs of ovulation in areas with high prey density, where they were also heavier. Further, we show that female Eurasian lynx that mature early have the same number of placental scars (an index of breeding investment and litter size) as older females, suggesting that they have a relatively high investment in their first litter. This induces a cost in terms of body weight development, as those females that had matured at the age of 1.5 years were substantially lighter by the age of 2.5 years than those that postponed breeding. This effect tended to be more pronounced in areas with low prey density. We discuss to what extent this might affect their future fitness prospects, and suggest that such costs of maturing early in terms of body weight development might be high in terrestrial large carnivores due to a prolonged period of postnatal care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 72 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 40%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 64%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,123,926
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#324
of 4,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,811
of 94,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.