↓ Skip to main content

Scent-marking in lone wolves and newly formed pairs

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Behaviour, August 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scent-marking in lone wolves and newly formed pairs
Published in
Animal Behaviour, August 1979
DOI 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90010-1
Authors

Russell J. Rothman, L.David Mech

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 58%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Animal Behaviour
#3,287
of 6,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,435
of 5,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Behaviour
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.