↓ Skip to main content

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and the question of cumulative culture: an experimental approach

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and the question of cumulative culture: an experimental approach
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-007-0135-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Andrew Whiten

Abstract

There is increasing evidence for cultural variations in behaviour among non-human species, but human societies additionally display elaborate cumulative cultural evolution, with successive generations building on earlier achievements. Evidence for cumulative culture in non-human species remains minimal and controversial. Relevant experiments are also lacking. Here we present a first experiment designed to examine chimpanzees' capacity for cumulative social learning. Eleven young chimpanzees were presented with a foraging device, which afforded both a relatively simple and a more complex tool-use technique for extracting honey. The more complex 'probing' technique incorporated the core actions of the simpler 'dipping' one and was also much more productive. In a baseline, exploration condition only two subjects discovered the dipping technique and a solitary instance of probing occurred. Demonstrations of dipping by a familiar human were followed by acquisition of this technique by the five subjects aged three years or above, whilst younger subjects showed a significant increase only in the elements of the dipping technique. By contrast, subsequent demonstrations of the probing task were not followed by acquisition of this more productive technique. Subjects stuck to their habitual dipping method despite an escalating series of demonstrations eventually exceeding 200. Supplementary tests showed this technique is within the capability of chimpanzees of this age. We therefore tentatively conclude that young chimpanzees exhibit a tendency to become 'stuck' on a technique they initially learn, inhibiting cumulative social learning and possibly constraining the species' capacity for cumulative cultural evolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 209 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Student > Bachelor 43 19%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 31%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,449,836
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#511
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,072
of 155,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.