| Title |
Enamel carbon isotope evidence of diet and habitat of Gigantopithecus blacki and associated mammalian megafauna in the Early Pleistocene of South China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Bulletin, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11434-011-4732-4 |
| Authors |
LingXia Zhao, LiZhao Zhang, FuSong Zhang, XinZhi Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 34% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,432,563
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#161
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,373
of 136,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.