You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A conduit dilation model of methane venting from lake sediments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2011gl046768 |
| Authors |
Benjamin P. Scandella, Charuleka Varadharajan, Harold F. Hemond, Carolyn Ruppel, Ruben Juanes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 29% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,186,497
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,875
of 21,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,821
of 119,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#52
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.