↓ Skip to main content

The Stem Cell Research Environment: A Patchwork of Patchworks

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
The Stem Cell Research Environment: A Patchwork of Patchworks
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12015-009-9071-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Caulfield, Amy Zarzeczny, Jennifer McCormick, Tania Bubela, Christine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Jacques Galipeau, Shawn Harmon, Michael Huynh, Insoo Hyun, Judy Illes, Rosario Isasi, Yann Joly, Graeme Laurie, Geoff Lomax, Holly Longstaff, Michael McDonald, Charles Murdoch, Ubaka Ogbogu, Jason Owen-Smith, Shaun Pattinson, Shainur Premji, Barbara von Tigerstrom, David E. Winickoff

Abstract

Few areas of recent research have received as much focus or generated as much excitement and debate as stem cell research. Hope for the therapeutic promise of this field has been matched by social concern associated largely with the sources of stem cells and their uses. This interplay between promise and controversy has contributed to the enormous variation that exists among the environments in which stem cell research is conducted throughout the world. This variation is layered upon intra-jurisdictional policies that are also often complex and in flux, resulting in what we term a 'patchwork of patchworks'. This patchwork of patchworks and its implications will become increasingly important as we enter this new era of stem cell research. The current progression towards translational and clinical research among international collaborators serves as a catalyst for identifying potential policy conflict and makes it imperative to address jurisdictional variability in stem cell research environments. The existing patchworks seen in contemporary stem cell research environments provide a valuable opportunity to consider how variations in regulations and policies across and within jurisdictions influence research efficiencies and directions. In one sense, the stem cell research context can be viewed as a living experiment occurring across the globe. The lessons to be gleaned from examining this field have great potential for broad-ranging general science policy application.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2011.
All research outputs
#6,734,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#285
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,857
of 122,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.