↓ Skip to main content

Fluctuation Theorems

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 508)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluctuation Theorems
Published in
Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, May 2008
DOI 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104555
Pubmed ID
Authors

E.M. Sevick, R. Prabhakar, Stephen R. Williams, Debra J. Searles

Abstract

Fluctuation theorems, developed over the past 15 years, have resulted in fundamental breakthroughs in our understanding of how irreversibility emerges from reversible dynamics and have provided new statistical mechanical relationships for free-energy changes. They describe the statistical fluctuations in time-averaged properties of many-particle systems such as fluids driven to nonequilibrium states and provide some of the few analytical expressions that describe nonequilibrium states. Quantitative predictions on fluctuations in small systems that are monitored over short periods can also be made, and therefore the fluctuation theorems allow thermodynamic concepts to be extended to apply to finite systems. For this reason, we anticipate an important role for fluctuation theorems in the design of nanotechnological devices and in the understanding of biological processes. This review discusses these theorems, their physical significance, and results for experimental and model systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 207 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 27%
Researcher 53 23%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Professor 15 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 110 47%
Chemistry 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Engineering 12 5%
Mathematics 11 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 33 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,765,033
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Physical Chemistry
#12
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,115
of 81,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Physical Chemistry
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.