↓ Skip to main content

Low temperature co-fired ceramic packaging of CMOS capacitive sensor chip towards cell viability monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low temperature co-fired ceramic packaging of CMOS capacitive sensor chip towards cell viability monitoring
Published in
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.3762/bjnano.7.179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niina Halonen, Joni Kilpijärvi, Maciej Sobocinski, Timir Datta-Chaudhuri, Antti Hassinen, Someshekar B Prakash, Peter Möller, Pamela Abshire, Sakari Kellokumpu, Anita Lloyd Spetz

Abstract

Cell viability monitoring is an important part of biosafety evaluation for the detection of toxic effects on cells caused by nanomaterials, preferably by label-free, noninvasive, fast, and cost effective methods. These requirements can be met by monitoring cell viability with a capacitance-sensing integrated circuit (IC) microchip. The capacitance provides a measurement of the surface attachment of adherent cells as an indication of their health status. However, the moist, warm, and corrosive biological environment requires reliable packaging of the sensor chip. In this work, a second generation of low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technology was combined with flip-chip bonding to provide a durable package compatible with cell culture. The LTCC-packaged sensor chip was integrated with a printed circuit board, data acquisition device, and measurement-controlling software. The packaged sensor chip functioned well in the presence of cell medium and cells, with output voltages depending on the medium above the capacitors. Moreover, the manufacturing of microfluidic channels in the LTCC package was demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,823,109
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
#139
of 1,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,049
of 416,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.