| Title |
Yartsa Gunbu (Cordyceps sinensis) and the Fungal Commodification of Tibet’s Rural Economy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-008-9038-3 |
| Authors |
Daniel Winkler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,359,377
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#65
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,045
of 91,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.