↓ Skip to main content

Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: a 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: a 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00787-012-0374-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su-Jin Yang, Robert Stewart, Jae-Min Kim, Sung-Wan Kim, Il-Seon Shin, Michael E. Dewey, Sean Maskey, Jin-Sang Yoon

Abstract

Traditional bullying has received considerable research but the emerging phenomenon of cyber-bullying much less so. Our study aims to investigate environmental and psychological factors associated with traditional and cyber-bullying. In a school-based 2-year prospective survey, information was collected on 1,344 children aged 10 including bullying behavior/experience, depression, anxiety, coping strategies, self-esteem, and psychopathology. Parents reported demographic data, general health, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. These were investigated in relation to traditional and cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization at age 12. Male gender and depressive symptoms were associated with all types of bullying behavior and experience. Living with a single parent was associated with perpetration of traditional bullying while higher ADHD symptoms were associated with victimization from this. Lower academic achievement and lower self esteem were associated with cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization, and anxiety symptoms with cyber-bullying perpetration. After adjustment, previous bullying perpetration was associated with victimization from cyber-bullying but not other outcomes. Cyber-bullying has differences in predictors from traditional bullying and intervention programmes need to take these into consideration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 286 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 54 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 102 35%
Social Sciences 42 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Arts and Humanities 11 4%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 64 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,687,671
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,342
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,412
of 282,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.