↓ Skip to main content

Circulating tumor cells as therapy-related biomarkers in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Circulating tumor cells as therapy-related biomarkers in cancer patients
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00262-012-1387-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias M. Gorges, Klaus Pantel

Abstract

Carcinomas (tumors of epithelial origin) are responsible for most of all new cancers in the industrialized countries. Due to the high mortality rate caused by the metastatic spread of aggressive cancer cells, there is an urgent demand in finding new biomarkers, which should detect early formation of metastases and monitor efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy in a timely manner. It has been considered that the molecular analysis of cells which are shed from tumors into the blood system (circulating tumor cells (CTCs)) might provide new insights for the clinical management of cancer, probably far earlier than using traditional high-resolution imaging technologies. Clinical trials indicated that CTCs can be deployed for diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic purposes. Furthermore, these cells are discussed to be suitable as predictive markers. In any case, identification of CTCs requires innovative and challenging technologies as detection methods should be specific, sensitive, standardized, and highly reproducible. Although many different approaches have been developed until now, only the CellSearch™ method has been cleared by the American Food and Drug Administration. Although the detection of CTCs has already shown to have a prognostic impact in many tumor entities including breast, prostate, lung and colon cancer, ongoing and future studies are aimed to explore whether CTCs can be used for an individual therapy decision making including novel immunotherapeutic approaches. This review discusses (1) different detection strategies for CTCs, (2) their clinical impact, and (3) the potential use of CTCs guiding the treatment of individual cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Engineering 14 10%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,780,115
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#496
of 2,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,126
of 286,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.