↓ Skip to main content

PM2.5, oxidant defence and cardiorespiratory health: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
PM2.5, oxidant defence and cardiorespiratory health: a review
Published in
Environmental Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-12-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott A Weichenthal, Krystal Godri Pollitt, Paul J Villeneuve

Abstract

Airborne fine particle mass concentrations (PM2.5) are used for ambient air quality management worldwide based in part on known cardiorespiratory health effects. While oxidative stress is generally thought to be an important mechanism in determining these effects, relatively few studies have specifically examined how oxidant defence may impact susceptibility to particulate air pollution. Here we review studies that explore the impact of polymorphisms in anti-oxidant related genes or anti-oxidant supplementation on PM2.5-induced cardiorespiratory outcomes in an effort to summarize existing evidence related to oxidative stress defence and the health effects of PM2.5. Recent studies of PM-oxidative burden were also examined. In total, nine studies were identified and reviewed and existing evidence generally suggests that oxidant defence may modify the impact of PM2.5 exposure on various health outcomes, particularly heart rate variability (a measure of autonomic function) which was the most common outcome examined in the studies reviewed. Few studies examined interactions between PM2.5 and oxidant defence for respiratory outcomes, and in general studies focused primarily on acute health effects. Therefore, further evaluation of the potential modifying role of oxidant defence in PM2.5-induced health effects is required, particularly for chronic outcomes. Similarly, while an exposure metric that captures the ability of PM2.5 to cause oxidative stress may offer advantages over traditional mass concentration measurements, little epidemiological evidence is currently available to evaluate the potential benefits of such an approach. Therefore, further evaluation is required to determine how this metric may be incorporated in ambient air quality management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,338,033
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,253
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,918
of 192,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.