You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cancer and neurologic degeneration in xeroderma pigmentosum: long term follow-up characterises the role of DNA repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmg.2010.083022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Porcia T Bradford, Alisa M Goldstein, Deborah Tamura, Sikandar G Khan, Takahiro Ueda, Jennifer Boyle, Kyu-Seon Oh, Kyoko Imoto, Hiroki Inui, Shin-Ichi Moriwaki, Steffen Emmert, Kristen M Pike, Arati Raziuddin, Teri M Plona, John J DiGiovanna, Margaret A Tucker, Kenneth H Kraemer |
| Abstract |
The frequency of cancer, neurologic degeneration and mortality in xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) patients with defective DNA repair was determined in a four decade natural history study. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,449,095
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#334
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,537
of 179,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.