| Title |
A unique foot‐worn device for patients with degenerative meniscal tear
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-012-2026-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Avi Elbaz, Yiftah Beer, Ehud Rath, Guy Morag, Ganit Segal, Eytan M. Debbi, Daniel Wasser, Amit Mor, Ronen Debi |
| Abstract |
The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of a new foot-worn device on the gait, physical function and pain in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) who had a low-impact injury to the medial meniscus causing a degenerative meniscal tear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,271,180
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,770
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,379
of 163,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#27
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.